<xml>
  <records>
    <record>
       <contributors>
          <authors>
             <author>Sun, Y.P.</author>
             <author>Borland, M.</author>
          </authors>
       </contributors>
       <titles>
          <title>
             Comparison of Nonlinear Dynamics Optimization Methods for APS-U
          </title>
       </titles>
		 <publisher>JACoW</publisher>
       <pub-location>Geneva, Switzerland</pub-location>
		 <isbn>978-3-95450-180-9</isbn>
		 <electronic-resource-num>10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2016-WEPOB15</electronic-resource-num>
		 <language>English</language>
		 <pages>924-927</pages>
       <pages>WEPOB15</pages>
       <keywords>
          <keyword>ion</keyword>
          <keyword>lattice</keyword>
          <keyword>sextupole</keyword>
          <keyword>octupole</keyword>
          <keyword>optics</keyword>
       </keywords>
       <work-type>Contribution to a conference proceedings</work-type>
       <dates>
          <year>2017</year>
          <pub-dates>
             <date>2017-01</date>
          </pub-dates>
       </dates>
       <urls>
          <related-urls>
              <url>http://dx.doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2016-WEPOB15</url>
              <url>https://jacow.org/napac2016/papers/wepob15.pdf</url>
          </related-urls>
       </urls>
       <abstract>
          Many different objectives and genetic algorithms have been proposed for storage ring nonlinear dynamics performance optimization. These optimization objectives include nonlinear chromaticities and driving/detuning terms, on-momentum and off-momentum dynamic acceptance, chromatic detuning, local momentum acceptance, variation of transverse invariant, Touschek lifetime, etc. In this paper, the effectiveness of several different optimization methods and objectives are compared for the nonlinear beam dynamics optimization of the Advanced Photon Source upgrade (APS-U) lattice. The optimized solutions from these different methods are preliminarily compared in terms of the dynamic acceptance, local momentum acceptance, chromatic detuning, and other performance measures.
       </abstract>
    </record>
  </records>
</xml>
