<xml>
  <records>
    <record>
       <contributors>
          <authors>
             <author>Watts, A.C.</author>
             <author>Johnstone, C.</author>
             <author>Johnstone, J.A.</author>
          </authors>
       </contributors>
       <titles>
          <title>
             Computed Tomography of Transverse Phase Space
          </title>
       </titles>
		 <publisher>JACoW</publisher>
       <pub-location>Geneva, Switzerland</pub-location>
		 <isbn>978-3-95450-180-9</isbn>
		 <electronic-resource-num>10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2016-TUPOA36</electronic-resource-num>
		 <language>English</language>
		 <pages>358-360</pages>
       <pages>TUPOA36</pages>
       <keywords>
          <keyword>ion</keyword>
          <keyword>simulation</keyword>
          <keyword>quadrupole</keyword>
          <keyword>instrumentation</keyword>
          <keyword>optics</keyword>
       </keywords>
       <work-type>Contribution to a conference proceedings</work-type>
       <dates>
          <year>2017</year>
          <pub-dates>
             <date>2017-01</date>
          </pub-dates>
       </dates>
       <urls>
          <related-urls>
              <url>http://dx.doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2016-TUPOA36</url>
              <url>https://jacow.org/napac2016/papers/tupoa36.pdf</url>
          </related-urls>
       </urls>
       <abstract>
          Two computed tomography techniques are explored to reconstruct beam transverse phase space using both simulated beam and multi-wire profile data in the Fermilab Muon Test Area ("MTA") beamline. Both Filtered Back-Projection ("FBP") and Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique ("SART") algorithms are considered and compared. Errors and artifacts are compared as a function of each algorithm's free parameters, and it is shown through simulation and MTA beamline profiles that SART is advantageous for reconstructions with limited profile data.
       </abstract>
    </record>
  </records>
</xml>
