Miskovich Sara
MOOD3
Efficient tuning of particle accelerator emittance via Bayesian algorithm execution and virtual objectives
Although beam emittance is critical for the performance of high-brightness accelerators, optimization is often time limited as emittance calculations, commonly done via quadrupole scans, are typically slow. Such calculations are a type of *multi-point queries*, i.e. each query requires multiple secondary measurements. Traditional black-box optimizers such as Bayesian optimization are slow and inefficient when dealing with such objectives as they must acquire the full series of measurements, but return only the emittance, with each query. We propose using Bayesian Algorithm Execution (BAX) to instead query and model individual beam-size measurements. BAX avoids the slow multi-point query on the accelerator by acquiring points through a *virtual objective*, i.e. calculating the emittance objective from a fast learned model rather than directly from the accelerator. Here, we use BAX to minimize emittance at the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) and the Facility for Advanced Accelerator Experimental Tests II (FACET-II). In simulation, BAX is 20x faster and more robust to noise compared to existing methods. In live LCLS and FACET-II tests, BAX performed the first automated emittance tuning, matching the hand-tuned emittance at FACET-II and achieving a 24% lower emittance at LCLS. Our method represents a conceptual shift for optimizing multi-point queries, and we anticipate that it can be readily adapted to other similar problems commonly found in particle accelerators and beyond.
  • R. Roussel, S. Miskovich, A. Edelen, D. Ratner, W. Colocho, C. Emma, J. Garrahan, T. Maxwell, C. Mayes
    SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
  • W. Neiswanger, S. Ermon
    Stanford University
Slides: MOOD3
Cite: reference for this paper using: BibTeX, LaTeX, Text/Word, RIS, EndNote
TUPA104
Status and first results from FACET-II towards the demonstration of plasma wakefield acceleration, coherent radiation generation, and probing strong-field QED
1549
FACET-II is a National User Facility at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory with the goal to develop advanced acceleration and coherent radiation techniques using a 10 GeV electron beam of unprecedented beam intensity with >100 kA peak current and <10 µm spot size, a 10 TW experimental laser system, and a variety of solid, gas and plasma targets. A diverse experimental program will investigate beam-driven plasma wakefield acceleration (PWFA), injection, and control with the aim of demonstrating efficient multi-GeV/m PWFA while preserving emittance and narrow energy spread – as is required to reach the beam parameters for a future linear collider. Complimentary research programs into the application of machine learning for accelerator diagnostics and control, novel techniques for the generation of intense coherent radiation, and probing strong-field quantum electrodynamics (QED) also make use of the facility’s unique beam intensity and laser capabilities. The first year of beam delivery to experiments has focused on user assisted commissioning of beam delivery and experimental systems, including a novel EOS BPM with 10 fs bunch length and 5 µm transverse resolution. This contribution will describe the status of the facility, experimental systems, and novel diagnostics, in addition to reviewing the first scientific developments from User programs including initial progress towards beam-driven PWFA.
  • D. Storey, J. Allen, L. Alsberg, C. Clarke, A. Edelen, H. Ekerfelt, C. Emma, E. Gerstmayr, S. Gessner, C. Hast, M. Hogan, K. Larsen, R. Loney, A. Marinelli, S. Meuren, S. Miskovich, B. O'Shea, M. Parker, T. Peterson, R. Roussel, R. Watt, G. White, V. Yakimenko, G. Yocky
    SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
  • E. Adli, J. Cao
    University of Oslo
  • R. Ariniello, C. Doss, C. Hansel, V. Lee, M. Litos
    Colorado University at Boulder
  • L. Berman, A. Sutherland
    University of Strathclyde
  • P. Bucksbaum
    Stanford PULSE Institute
  • S. Corde, M. Gilljohann, A. Knetsch, A. Matheron, P. San Miguel Claveria
    Laboratoire d'Optique Appliquée
  • F. Fiuza
    Instituto de Plasmas e Fusão Nuclear
  • R. Hessami
    Particle Beam Physics Lab (PBPL)
  • B. Hidding
    Cockcroft Institute
  • R. Holtzapple
    California Polytechnic State University
  • C. Joshi, K. Marsh, Z. Nie, C. Zhang
    University of California, Los Angeles
  • C. Keitel, M. Tamburini
    Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik
  • D. Reis
    Michigan University
  • R. Robles
    Stanford University
  • A. Scheinker
    Los Alamos National Laboratory
  • N. Vafaei-Najafabadi
    Stony Brook University
  • J. Wang
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln
  • R. Zgadzaj
    The University of Texas at Austin
Paper: TUPA104
DOI: reference for this paper: 10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2023-TUPA104
About:  Received: 07 May 2023 — Revised: 14 Jun 2023 — Accepted: 14 Jun 2023 — Issue date: 26 Sep 2023
Cite: reference for this paper using: BibTeX, LaTeX, Text/Word, RIS, EndNote