<xml>
  <records>
    <record>
       <contributors>
          <authors>
             <author>Robbins, J.A.</author>
             <author>Eichhorn, R.G.</author>
          </authors>
       </contributors>
       <titles>
          <title>
             How Uniform Are Cool-Downs?
          </title>
       </titles>
		 <publisher>JACoW</publisher>
       <pub-location>Geneva, Switzerland</pub-location>
		 <isbn>978-3-95450-178-6</isbn>
		 <electronic-resource-num>10.18429/JACoW-SRF2015-MOPB011</electronic-resource-num>
		 <language>English</language>
		 <pages>100-104</pages>
       <pages>MOPB011</pages>
       <keywords>
          <keyword>cavity</keyword>
          <keyword>interface</keyword>
          <keyword>simulation</keyword>
          <keyword>niobium</keyword>
          <keyword>factory</keyword>
       </keywords>
       <work-type>Contribution to a conference proceedings</work-type>
       <dates>
          <year>2015</year>
          <pub-dates>
             <date>2015-12</date>
          </pub-dates>
       </dates>
       <urls>
          <related-urls>
              <url>http://dx.doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-SRF2015-MOPB011</url>
              <url>http://srf2015.vrws.de/papers/mopb011.pdf</url>
          </related-urls>
       </urls>
       <abstract>
          Since the last SRF conference it has become clear that achieving extremely high quality factors of SRF cavities depend on the cool-down scenario. While some findings favor a fast cool-down, others suggest a slow cycle to be advantageous, and many variations to that have been investigated: the role of thermocurrents, amount of ambient magnetic field and flux trapping. This paper will investigate, how uniformly different cool-down procedures are and if they can explain the more efficient magnetic flux expulsion.
       </abstract>
    </record>
  </records>
</xml>
