<xml>
  <records>
    <record>
       <contributors>
          <authors>
             <author>Wang, L.</author>
             <author>Emma, P.</author>
             <author>Qiang, J.</author>
             <author>Raubenheimer, T.O.</author>
          </authors>
       </contributors>
       <titles>
          <title>
             Benchmark of ELEGANT and IMPACT
          </title>
       </titles>
       <pages>TUP066</pages>
       <keywords>
          <keyword>space-charge</keyword>
          <keyword>wakefield</keyword>
          <keyword>linac</keyword>
          <keyword>optics</keyword>
          <keyword>undulator</keyword>
       </keywords>
       <dates>
          <year>2015</year>
          <pub-dates>
             <date>2015-12</date>
          </pub-dates>
       </dates>
       <abstract>
          The beam dynamics codes ELEGANT and IMAPCT have many users. We use these two codes for the design of LCLSII. Both codes use a 1D model for the coherent synchrotron radiation (CSR) in bend magnets. In addition, IMPACT has a 3D space-charge model, while ELEGANT uses a 1D model. To compare the two codes, especially the space-charge effects, we systematically benchmark the two codes with different physics aspects: wakefields, CSR and space-charge forces.
       </abstract>
    </record>
  </records>
</xml>
